WYSIWYG Webbuilder 5 and Taco Trio

This is how it would go on any computer forum, some beginner would post, “What is the best tool to make a web-page?” Some macho self proclaimed HTML master user would always post, “Notepad, I only will use notepad.”  I surely respect one who can code HTML well in notepad, but with so many editors and tools to assist with web-page and site creation, I say, “Why?”   The macho notepadder would of course answer, “Because it gives me total control over all my code.”  When I hear something like that, I just know their pages are probably about as creative and visual as server errors.   There are so many great web-page editors out there these days, especially WYSIWYG (What You See IS What You Get) editors, that do such fantastic jobs, I view a notepad page writer as a masochist.

Dreamweaver has always been my weapon of choice when throwing up a site, but Dreamweaver is still, to me, not for those new to web design and page making.  You still need the Code View part of Dreamweaver to get your pages the way you want them.  SiteSpinner has been my choice for no code, little effort, web-page making, in the past.  But it has not been truly updated in sometime, and something about its CSS has me convinced I can tell if the page is made in SS just by watching it load.

I had tried WYSIWYG Web Builder in the past (when it was free) and liked it a lot, but it was definitely missing a few things.  I see that version 5 has come a long way. Most of the features I felt it lacked are now right there, and there are plenty of innovative and even unexpected features that make this a great web page builder.  The shape shadow and form builder alone would make great software, but put all these things together and you can whip up very professional pages up quickly and with ease. Seriously, there is no better tool out there for quickly laying out pixel precise images and text on a web-page.  One can have a page made an loaded on a server, before a Notepad coder got the header written.

There are a few things that I find lacking with WYSIWYG Web Builder. It’s import functions are fairly poor. Unlike Dreamweaver which can pull any page in, no matter what it was made with, and retain it’s CSS and layout, WYSIWYG Web Builder massacres the style and from what I’ve seen really messes up layers and divs.  Pretty much unusable for complicated already made sites and templates.  If they could get importing working well, this would really be the WYSIWYG editor to beat.  Note: Site Spinner and most other WYSIWYG editors can’t import pages not made in it at all.  Another feature it needs, is a very easy way to move all objects below a certain point down. Especially important with long copy pages. You can select everything below manually, but this can be a little tricky with lots of objects on the page. NO worries though,  It is really actively developed piece of software, so I just know they’ll eventually have all the features I can think of, and more.

WYSIWYG Web Builder is highly recommended for those that want to put up pages and sites quickly and easily.  http://www.wysiwygwebbuilder.com/

My taco for this post is actually three tacos.  The Baja Fresh chain (I know, a chain, but trust me these are tasty) has a special called Taco Trio.  You get a steak, chicken, and shrimp taco.  These are soft corn tortia tacos (doubled up of course), and they are not just ordinary.  All three have a good size slice of avocado in them, and they live up to their themes: Diablo Steak (good steak with a nice spice). Tropical Chicken (the slice of pineapple makes it great), and Blackened Shrimp (could have been more blackened though).   I was quite impressed, these really shine above Baja Fresh’s other offerings. They should leave the white sauce out of the chicken and shrimp ones though.

5 Responses to “WYSIWYG Webbuilder 5 and Taco Trio”

  1. i work in technology and love tacos also. I live in Los Angeles.

    You left wrong directions to your blog on my site (techandtacos.com forgot the wordpress part), and for a moment I was sad that this tech and taco site was just a sick joke or something.

    I like the “here’s some tech, and here’s some taco” format for posts but as blogging is a marathon and not a sprint you may find that format to be limiting and ultimately too rigid to churn out quality posts week in and week out.

    Good beginnings can help you avoid bad endings, and I think in this case that is true.

    I once decided to make a photo coffee table book of people farting on celebrities, after my friend farted on Richard Dreyfuss at a book signing and I took a photo of it. But logistically it was very difficult to fill out a book with content like this. A photobook of funny celebrity pictures may have been more doable.

    Something of a barter offer, if you could write something tech for my site I’ll write about the best tacos that i know of.

  2. Tech&Taco Ringmaster Says:

    Thanks for stopping by Andy. Sorry about the mix up, not used to being a subdomain yet I guess.

    I’m actually looking forward to the focus and rigidity I’ve established here. I’m planning on staying fairly tight to my objective, but I’m sure the boundries of what is tech, and what is taco will expand, as I feel they can.
    These topics are actually very sustainable for me. I feel it will be like the start of a great TV sitcom. The first year is always, “How are they going to sustain that premis.” 11 years later its, “How can they be ending that, its the greatest show on TV.”

    Personally I am the type that would only purchase the ‘People Farting on Celebrities’ book. It seems focused and dead on funny and the effort of someone gathering such photos would be meaningful. A ‘Funny Celebity Pictures’ would probably reak of mediocraty and realization that such a thing has been done to death. Actually, the book I’m waiting for is a bunch of different friends farting on Richard Dreyfuss on different occasions.

    The discount books in the front of a bookstore are always collections, unintended collaberations, and hodge podges. The best sellers that never even get a percent off sticker are usually focused and rigid in topic.

    I’d certainly would like to take you up on cross posting. I’ll keep reading your blog and try to find something Tech your readers would be interested in. Maybe even a post on El Salvador as I’ve seen spent some time there, and see you mention Salvadorians and Pupusas in your blog (It’s not the gangsters you worry so much about there, It’s the village politicians with much bigger bodycounts)

  3. I am using WYSIWYGwebbuilder 5 and I am very happy with it.
    Have a look at few of my sites created with it-
    http://www.stfranciscollege.edu.in
    http://www.lucknowicwai.org

  4. [quote]There are a few things that I find lacking with WYSIWYG Web Builder. It’s import functions are fairly poor. Unlike Dreamweaver which can pull any page in, no matter what it was made with, and retain it’s CSS and layout, WYSIWYG Web Builder massacres the style and from what I’ve seen really messes up layers and divs. Pretty much unusable for complicated already made sites and templates. If they could get importing working well, this would really be the WYSIWYG editor to beat.[/quote]
    I put this up to the software developer of WYSIWYGwebbuilde and this is the reply I got from him…
    [quote]WYSIWYG Web Builder is not an HTML editor, it is an HTML generator.
    It will never be able to edit HTML code. An HTML editor is a completely different kind of tool.

    Related FAQ topic:
    http://www.wysiwygwebbuilder.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=138/quote

  5. Tech&Taco Ringmaster Says:

    Back when WYSIWYG Web Builder was young (and Free by the way). There was a lot of work done on the function to open and edit web pages, and it did get better through a couple of versions. Then it just stopped be worked on.

    I think it is really just a difficulty factor. Dreamweaver and the Microsoft equivalent of the year have been among the few companies that have even taken up this challenge (with early MS products massacring the code to achieve this). Most of the others have gone with the “Generator”.

    Actually I don’t know what the future holds for Web builder apps anyway, the way CMS systems are going. At some point it is just going to be all done in a CMS. A CMS with pixel perfect placement, graphic editing ccapacity and with layers and everything, will be the end of it for programs like WYSIWYG Web Builder.

Leave a Reply